Is there any product in the firearms community that’s caused as much controversy as the Taurus Judge? If there is, I’m not aware of it. I’ve read more reviews, comments, articles, posts, proclamations, missives, manifestos, and mumbo-jumbo about the Judge than anything else.
It’s kind of surreal to see so much vitriol being spouted from both sides, the fanatics and the haters, about one little product. And I’ve come to the conclusion that maybe a lot of it is driven by misunderstandings, or preconceived notions, or by resentment about something entirely unrelated (i.e., maybe people are lashing out against the Judge’s marketing campaign, or the perception that innocent/unknowing customers are being taken advantage of by being marketed such a product).
Now, while I can acknowledge that the fundamental purpose of the internet is to spawn arguments, I also have an abiding interest in simply answering questions. I believe that there are, indeed, answers, and when so many people have such opposing viewpoints, well — why not just get to the bottom of it? Why not test the product in a comprehensive manner, and see what it really, actually does?
After all, if it really is “ineffective” or “dangerous”, wouldn’t you want to know that? And if instead it really is “powerful” and “effective”, wouldn’t you want to know that? I know I would. But then again, maybe that’s just me, because … if the arguments were actually settled, what would the internet fight over?
Ah, actually, we never have to worry about that, because as long as there’s politics, there will be something for the internet to argue over. So, with that said, let’s get on with dispelling some misconceptions, burying some bulloney, and shedding some light on this whole Judge situation so that we, the community of those interested in self-defense, can evaluate the Judge based on knowing what its actual capabilities are.
The video is long… so long, I had to break it up in two parts. Hope you enjoy it, or at least find it useful!
Here’s Part 1, where I compare the Judge Public Defender as a compact .45-caliber pistol against a common, well-reviewed, well-performing concealed-carry .45-caliber pistol, the Springfield XDS:
And in Part 2, I examine the Public Defender as a shotgun, comparing it to a 12-gauge, demonstrating its use with buckshot and birdshot, and evaluating its performance when using Judge-specific ammo (i.e., ammo that was designed specifically for the Judge). There are ballistic gel tests, patterning charts, and some revealing conclusions that should forever answer the question as to whether the Public Defender is a powerful and/or effective defensive weapon.
Share your comments, and hey, if you feel like it, share the videos too. When you come across someone making uninformed or just plain incorrect statements about the Judge, well, now you can share the answers.
